Home >

Luxury Tax Is Not A "Robbing The Rich And Helping The Poor" Behavior?

2014/12/11 15:38:00 33

Luxury GoodsTaxationPolicy

In the United States, the voice of disapproving taxes on luxury goods is very high not just for millionaires but for ordinary people. In the 90 era of the last century, the United States Congress had introduced cruise ships, personal airplanes, and precious stones. Leather and fur Luxury goods such as luxury goods are levied, but it is found that the results are very different from those expected in advance.

It is undeniable that there is a controversy over whether the luxury tax has been explicitly collected in China, although the consumption tax reform is advancing continuously. Luxury tax The news of the levy only heard its voice, and no clear policy was issued.

Some government officials believe that China Luxury tax is needed. Because the production of luxury goods is generally not replicable, and at the same time, in the production process, it often costs a lot of resources, and high taxes are taken for granted. At present, there are many "not bad money" people. There are more "bad money" people. There is a great disparity between the rich and the poor. The new round of income distribution reform needs to be accelerated to solve the problems among regions, between urban and rural areas and between industries.

At the same time, reporters found that people who support the Levy of luxury consumption tax believe that by imposing taxes on luxury goods and allowing the consumption of the rich to be converted to support for the state's tax revenue, they can be subsidized to other public sectors, which can make the tax function more equitable and effectively curb the extravagant consumption. At the same time, it also plays a positive role in solving the problem of increasing income gap and balancing the interests of all social strata.

Frankly speaking, in some people's eyes, taxation of luxury goods is "digging rich people's money", "robbing the rich and helping the poor" and achieving the so-called social equity. However, many people doubt whether the Levy of luxury tax can really curb the consumption of luxury goods. "You have to study the shopping psychology of the owners, and the owners who are willing to pay huge sums of money do not care about paying more." A real estate analyst told reporters frankly that in his view, most of the people who spend most of their money are successful people. They do not mind facing thousands of luxury tax in that area.

Remember the classic dialogue in big movie? "We do not sell the best in real estate and sell the best." Such lines were unthinkable at that time, but now some of the dialogues have become portrayal of the Chinese concept of real consumption. Betty, who works at Chanel store in the United Kingdom, told reporters that some wealthy people from mainland China did not ask which season was the latest item after entering the store, but asked "which is the most expensive".

"They seem to be accustomed to not buying the prettiest ones, but choosing the most expensive ones." Betty said, "they (Chinese buyers) hardly care about the price, but they think the expensive is the best." Zhang Dawei, a luxury car dealer, also believes that the real consumption tax on luxury goods will not be too great for consumers who buy cars. Just like the Levy of large displacement vehicle consumption tax in 2008, it caused a collective price increase of large displacement cars at that time, but after the price increase, it also slowed down for several months.

Land Rover Jaguar dealer Lee told reporters frankly that people who can afford luxury cars will not care about this tax and fee. Nowadays, the price of a car on the market is several hundred thousand yuan. "And the more rich people buy cars, the more luxurious and luxurious they are. The more they want to buy, the better they will be." Mr. Li said.

Guo Fanli also believes that the Levy of so-called luxury tax is beneficial to the government, but it has impediment to the masses and the long-term development of the economy. "Luxury tax is not a behavior of" robbing the rich and helping the poor ". Luxury tax will make higher income people pay higher expenses when they buy luxury goods, but poor people will not enjoy better welfare. A larger portion of luxury tax will be paid by the government as official expenses. Guo Fanli said.

  • Related reading

"Alibaba Threat" Behind The Electricity Supplier Tax Problem

Latest topics
|
2014/12/11 8:13:00
33

Pakistan Chamber Of Commerce Calls On Government To Deepen Trade Relations With China

Latest topics
|
2014/12/10 16:16:00
99

The US AAFA Will Lobby The Government To Restore Preferential Trade Policy To Bangladesh.

Latest topics
|
2014/12/10 15:14:00
32

Swiss Politicians Have Challenged The Establishment Of An Authentication System For Animal Skins.

Latest topics
|
2014/12/10 14:57:00
16

Us FDRA Tailor Customs Resource Centre For Shoe Manufacturers

Latest topics
|
2014/12/6 18:17:00
14
Read the next article

Shoe Enterprises Spontaneously Test Water Business Pformation

In order to survive, many shoe companies in Huidong have tried to use online e-commerce to expand domestic sales channels. According to the statistics of Huidong electricity supplier Association, as of now, there are more than 5000 women's shoe shops and more than 40 Tmall stores in Huidong.